摘 要：违约精神损害赔偿问题近年来成为民法学界的重要研究议题，其理论正当性在法律实践与学术探讨中备受争议。本研究旨在通过系统分析违约行为对非财产性利益的侵害及其救济路径，探讨违约精神损害赔偿的正当性基础。研究采用规范分析与比较法相结合的方法，梳理国内外相关立法与判例，并结合我国现行法律框架进行深入论证。研究表明，违约行为可能引发的精神损害具有独立的法律意义，传统合同法以财产损失为核心的救济模式难以全面回应受害方的实际需求。本研究创新性地提出将精神损害纳入违约责任体系的可行性方案，并强调应通过明确构成要件和赔偿范围来平衡各方利益。这一结论不仅为完善我国合同法提供了理论支持，也为司法实践中相关案件的处理提供了参考依据，从而推动了违约责任制度的现代化发展。
关键词：违约精神损害赔偿；正当性基础；非财产性利益
Abstract：In recent years, the issue of compensatory damages for mental harm caused by breach of contract has become a significant research topic in the field of civil law, with its theoretical legitimacy being highly debated in both legal practice and academic discussions. This study aims to explore the justificatory basis of compensatory damages for mental harm resulting from breach of contract through a systematic analysis of how such breaches infringe upon non-pecuniary interests and the corresponding remedies available. By employing a combination of normative analysis and comparative legal methodology, the study examines relevant domestic and international legislation and case law, integrating these findings within the fr amework of China's current legal system for in-depth argumentation. The research reveals that mental harm caused by breach of contract holds independent legal significance, which traditional contract law, centered on compensation for pecuniary loss, fails to fully address the actual needs of the aggrieved party. Innovatively, this study proposes a feasible approach to incorporate mental harm into the liability system for breach of contract, emphasizing the necessity of defining constitutive elements and the scope of compensation to balance the interests of all parties involved. This conclusion not only provides theoretical support for the improvement of China's contract law but also offers reference for handling related cases in judicial practice, thereby promoting the modernization of the breach of contract liability system.
引言 1
一、违约精神损害赔偿的理论基础 1
(一)精神损害赔偿的基本概念 1
(二)违约责任与精神损害的关系 2
(三)理论基础的正当性分析 2
二、国内外相关法律制度比较研究 3
(一)国外违约精神损害赔偿立法现状 3
(二)我国现行法律中的相关规定 3
(三)比较研究对正当性的启示 4
三、违约精神损害赔偿正当性的争议焦点 4
(一)合同法原则的冲突与协调 4
(二)精神损害赔偿范围的界定问题 5
(三)正当性争议的核心要素分析 5
四、违约精神损害赔偿正当性的实现路径 6
(一)法律规范的完善建议 6
(二)司法实践中的适用标准 6
(三)社会价值与法律效果的平衡 7
结论 7
参考文献 9
致谢 9
关键词：违约精神损害赔偿；正当性基础；非财产性利益
Abstract：In recent years, the issue of compensatory damages for mental harm caused by breach of contract has become a significant research topic in the field of civil law, with its theoretical legitimacy being highly debated in both legal practice and academic discussions. This study aims to explore the justificatory basis of compensatory damages for mental harm resulting from breach of contract through a systematic analysis of how such breaches infringe upon non-pecuniary interests and the corresponding remedies available. By employing a combination of normative analysis and comparative legal methodology, the study examines relevant domestic and international legislation and case law, integrating these findings within the fr amework of China's current legal system for in-depth argumentation. The research reveals that mental harm caused by breach of contract holds independent legal significance, which traditional contract law, centered on compensation for pecuniary loss, fails to fully address the actual needs of the aggrieved party. Innovatively, this study proposes a feasible approach to incorporate mental harm into the liability system for breach of contract, emphasizing the necessity of defining constitutive elements and the scope of compensation to balance the interests of all parties involved. This conclusion not only provides theoretical support for the improvement of China's contract law but also offers reference for handling related cases in judicial practice, thereby promoting the modernization of the breach of contract liability system.
Keywords: Moral Damage Compensation For Breach Of Contract；Legitimacy Basis；Non-Pecuniary Interests
引言 1
一、违约精神损害赔偿的理论基础 1
(一)精神损害赔偿的基本概念 1
(二)违约责任与精神损害的关系 2
(三)理论基础的正当性分析 2
二、国内外相关法律制度比较研究 3
(一)国外违约精神损害赔偿立法现状 3
(二)我国现行法律中的相关规定 3
(三)比较研究对正当性的启示 4
三、违约精神损害赔偿正当性的争议焦点 4
(一)合同法原则的冲突与协调 4
(二)精神损害赔偿范围的界定问题 5
(三)正当性争议的核心要素分析 5
四、违约精神损害赔偿正当性的实现路径 6
(一)法律规范的完善建议 6
(二)司法实践中的适用标准 6
(三)社会价值与法律效果的平衡 7
结论 7
参考文献 9
致谢 9
