认罪认罚从宽制度的价值冲突与平衡 -法学专业

摘要

认罪认罚从宽制度作为我国刑事司法改革的重要成果，旨在通过优化资源配置实现公正与效率的统一，但其在实践中面临价值冲突问题。本研究以认罪认罚从宽制度为切入点，探讨其在实施过程中可能引发的公正与效率、实体正义与程序正义、国家权力与个体权利之间的冲突，并尝试提出平衡策略。研究采用规范分析与实证研究相结合的方法，通过对相关法律文本的解读和对司法实践的案例分析，揭示制度运行中的潜在矛盾。结果表明，该制度在提升诉讼效率、缓解司法资源压力方面成效显著，但在保障被告人权益、确保案件质量等方面仍存在不足。这些措施有助于实现制度设计初衷，同时兼顾公平正义与司法效率，为推动我国刑事司法体系现代化提供了理论支持与实践指导。

关键词：认罪认罚从宽制度；价值冲突；公正与效率；权利保障；程序正当性

Value Conflicts and Balances in the Leniency System for Guilty Pleas

英文人名

Directive teacher:×××

Abstract

As an important achievement of our criminal justice reform, the leniency system of guilty plea aims to achieve the unity of justice and efficiency through optimizing resource allocation, but it faces the problem of value conflict in practice. This study takes the leniency system of guilty plea as the starting point to explore the conflicts between justice and efficiency, substantive justice and procedural justice, state power and individual rights that may be caused in the implementation process, and tries to propose a balance strategy. The research uses the method of combining normative analysis and empirical research, through the interpretation of relevant legal texts and the case analysis of judicial practice, to reveal the potential contradictions in the operation of the system. The results show that the system is effective in improving the efficiency of litigation and alleviating the pressure of judicial resources, but there are still shortcomings in protecting the rights and interests of defendants and ensuring the quality of cases. These measures help to realize the original intention of the system design, while giving consideration to fairness, justice and judicial efficiency, and provide theoretical support and practical guidance for promoting the modernization of our country's criminal justice system.

Keywords: Plea Leniency System；Value Conflict；Justice And Efficiency；Rights Protection；Procedural Legitimacy

引言 1

一、认罪认罚从宽制度的价值基础 1

(一)制度设立的背景与意义 1

(二)核心价值内涵解析 2

(三)价值基础的理论支撑 2

二、认罪认罚从宽制度的主要价值冲突 3

(一)公正与效率的对立统一 3

(二)被告人权利保障与司法权威的平衡 3

(三)社会效果与法律效果的矛盾 4

三、价值冲突的具体表现与成因分析 4

(一)实践中的公正性争议 4