虚假诉讼罪司法认定疑难问题研究 -法学专业

摘要

虚假诉讼罪作为扰乱司法秩序、损害他人合法权益的严重违法犯罪行为，近年来在我国司法实践中呈现高发态势。本研究旨在深入探讨虚假诉讼罪司法认定中的疑难问题，以期为司法实践提供理论支持和操作指引。当前司法实践中存在对虚假诉讼罪构成要件理解不一、证据标准把握不准等问题，导致案件定性困难。为此，本研究提出应明确虚假诉讼罪的构成要素，细化证据规则，建立科学合理的司法认定标准。同时，针对虚假诉讼罪与其他罪名交叉重叠的情况，提出了准确区分的方法。本研究创新性地构建了虚假诉讼罪司法认定的框架体系，为解决司法实践中的难题提供了新思路，有助于统一司法尺度，提高司法效率，维护司法权威和公信力，对完善我国刑事法治建设具有重要价值。

关键词：虚假诉讼罪司法认定构成要件

Abstract

The crime of false litigation, as a serious illegal and criminal behavior that disrupts the judicial order and damages the legitimate rights and interests of others, has shown a high incidence in the judicial practice of our country in recent years. The purpose of this study is to deeply explore the difficult problems in the judicial determination of false litigation crime, in order to provide theoretical support and operational guidance for judicial practice. At present, there are some problems in judicial practice, such as different understanding of the constitutive elements of the crime of false litigation and inaccurate grasp of the evidence standard, which lead to the difficulty in the characterization of the case. Therefore, this study proposes to clarify the elements of the crime of false litigation, refine the rules of evidence, and establish scientific and reasonable judicial identification standards. At the same time, aiming at the overlapping of false lawsuit crime and other charges, the method of accurately distinguishing is put forward. This research innovatively constructs a fr amework system for the judicial determination of false litigation crime, provides a new way to solve the problems in judicial practice, helps to unify the judicial scale, improve judicial efficiency, maintain judicial authority and credibility, and has important value for improving the construction of criminal rule of law in China.

Keyword:False Litigation Judicial Determination Constituent Elements

1绪论 1

1.1研究背景与意义 1

1.2研究现状综述 1

2虚假诉讼罪的构成要件分析 1

2.1主体认定标准探讨 1

2.2主观方面界定难题 2

2.3客观行为表现形式 2

2.4侵害客体范围确定 3

3司法实践中证据采信问题 3

3.1证据收集难点剖析 3

3.2证据真实性审查 4