摘 要
民事诉讼时效制度作为民法体系的重要组成部分，对维护社会秩序和法律关系稳定具有关键意义。本文聚焦民事诉讼时效制度的适用与中断事由，旨在深入剖析现行法律规定及其实践应用中的问题。通过对我国《民法典》及相关司法解释的系统梳理，结合国内外理论研究成果，采用文献研究、案例分析及比较法等方法，探讨了时效制度在不同类型民事案件中的具体适用规则。研究发现，当前立法虽已构建较为完善的时效框架，但在司法实践中仍存在理解分歧和适用难点，特别是在时效中断事由认定方面。本文创新性地提出了“动态平衡”理念，强调应根据不同案件特点灵活把握中断事由的认定标准，既保障债权人合法权益，又防止滥用时效制度。通过对大量典型案例的实证分析，归纳总结出不同类型中断事由的具体适用条件，为司法实践提供了可操作性强的参考依据。
关键词：民事诉讼时效 时效中断事由 动态平衡理念
Abstract
As an important part of civil law system, the limitation of action system is of key significance to maintaining social order and the stability of legal relations. This paper focuses on the application of the civil limitation of action system and the cause of interruption, and aims to deeply analyze the problems in the current legal provisions and their practical application. Through the systematic review of China's Civil Code and relevant judicial interpretations, combined with the theoretical research results at home and abroad, and using the methods of literature research, case analysis and comparative method, the specific application rules of the limitation system in different types of civil cases are discussed. It is found that although the current legislation has constructed a relatively perfect limitation fr amework, there are still differences in understanding and application difficulties in judicial practice, especially in the aspect of the determination of the cause of limitation interruption. This paper innovatively puts forward the concept of "dynamic balance", emphasizing that the identification standard of interruption reasons should be flexibly grasped according to the characteristics of different cases, so as to protect the legitimate rights and interests of creditors, and prevent the abuse of the limitation system. Through the empirical analysis of a large number of typical cases, the specific applicable conditions of different types of interruption causes are summarized, which provides a operable reference basis for judicial practice.
Keyword:Civil Litigation Time Limit Interruption Reasons Of Time Limit Dynamic Balance Concept
目 录
1绪论 1
1.1研究背景与意义 1
1.2国内外研究现状综述 1
1.3研究方法与技术路线 2
2民事诉讼时效制度的基本理论 2
2.1时效制度的法律属性 2
2.2时效期间的确定原则 3
2.3时效届满的法律后果 3
2.4时效制度的价值取向 4
3民事诉讼时效的适用范围 4
3.1各类民事权利的时效适用 4
3.2特殊主体的时效权益保护 5
3.3不同法律关系中的时效适用 5
3.4时效适用的例外情形 6
4民事诉讼时效中断事由分析 6
4.1时效中断的法定事由 6
4.2当事人行为引发的中断 7
4.3法律事实导致的时效中断 7
4.4中断效力及溯及力探讨 8
结论 9
参考文献 10
致谢 11
民事诉讼时效制度作为民法体系的重要组成部分，对维护社会秩序和法律关系稳定具有关键意义。本文聚焦民事诉讼时效制度的适用与中断事由，旨在深入剖析现行法律规定及其实践应用中的问题。通过对我国《民法典》及相关司法解释的系统梳理，结合国内外理论研究成果，采用文献研究、案例分析及比较法等方法，探讨了时效制度在不同类型民事案件中的具体适用规则。研究发现，当前立法虽已构建较为完善的时效框架，但在司法实践中仍存在理解分歧和适用难点，特别是在时效中断事由认定方面。本文创新性地提出了“动态平衡”理念，强调应根据不同案件特点灵活把握中断事由的认定标准，既保障债权人合法权益，又防止滥用时效制度。通过对大量典型案例的实证分析，归纳总结出不同类型中断事由的具体适用条件，为司法实践提供了可操作性强的参考依据。
关键词：民事诉讼时效 时效中断事由 动态平衡理念
Abstract
As an important part of civil law system, the limitation of action system is of key significance to maintaining social order and the stability of legal relations. This paper focuses on the application of the civil limitation of action system and the cause of interruption, and aims to deeply analyze the problems in the current legal provisions and their practical application. Through the systematic review of China's Civil Code and relevant judicial interpretations, combined with the theoretical research results at home and abroad, and using the methods of literature research, case analysis and comparative method, the specific application rules of the limitation system in different types of civil cases are discussed. It is found that although the current legislation has constructed a relatively perfect limitation fr amework, there are still differences in understanding and application difficulties in judicial practice, especially in the aspect of the determination of the cause of limitation interruption. This paper innovatively puts forward the concept of "dynamic balance", emphasizing that the identification standard of interruption reasons should be flexibly grasped according to the characteristics of different cases, so as to protect the legitimate rights and interests of creditors, and prevent the abuse of the limitation system. Through the empirical analysis of a large number of typical cases, the specific applicable conditions of different types of interruption causes are summarized, which provides a operable reference basis for judicial practice.
Keyword:Civil Litigation Time Limit Interruption Reasons Of Time Limit Dynamic Balance Concept
目 录
1绪论 1
1.1研究背景与意义 1
1.2国内外研究现状综述 1
1.3研究方法与技术路线 2
2民事诉讼时效制度的基本理论 2
2.1时效制度的法律属性 2
2.2时效期间的确定原则 3
2.3时效届满的法律后果 3
2.4时效制度的价值取向 4
3民事诉讼时效的适用范围 4
3.1各类民事权利的时效适用 4
3.2特殊主体的时效权益保护 5
3.3不同法律关系中的时效适用 5
3.4时效适用的例外情形 6
4民事诉讼时效中断事由分析 6
4.1时效中断的法定事由 6
4.2当事人行为引发的中断 7
4.3法律事实导致的时效中断 7
4.4中断效力及溯及力探讨 8
结论 9
参考文献 10
致谢 11
