摘 要
随着信息技术的迅猛发展，隐私权与名誉权保护面临前所未有的挑战，《民法典》作为民事基本法，在平衡二者关系方面具有重要意义。本研究旨在探讨《民法典》中隐私权与名誉权保护的平衡机制，以期为司法实践提供理论支持。通过文献分析、比较研究及案例剖析等方法，深入解读《民法典》相关条款内涵，梳理国内外立法例，剖析典型判例。研究发现，《民法典》确立了以权利位阶为基础、兼顾利益衡量的平衡原则，明确了行为人过错程度、行为方式、损害结果等因素在判定中的作用。创新性地提出“场景化”适用模式，根据不同情境调整保护强度，既保障个人尊严免受侵害，又促进信息合理流动。同时，构建了多元救济体系，涵盖预防性措施、事后补救机制，强化对受害人的全面保护。本研究不仅丰富了隐私权与名誉权理论体系。
关键词：民法典 隐私权与名誉权保护 平衡机制
Abstract
With the rapid development of information technology, the protection of privacy and reputation rights is facing unprecedented challenges. As the basic law of civil affairs, the Civil Code is of great significance in balancing the relationship between the two. The purpose of this study is to explore the balance mechanism between privacy and reputation protection in the Civil Code in order to provide theoretical support for judicial practice. Through literature analysis, comparative research and case analysis, the connotation of the relevant provisions of the Civil Code is deeply interpreted, domestic and foreign legislative cases are sorted out, and typical cases are analyzed. It is found that the Civil Code establishes the principle of balance based on the rank of rights and taking into account the measurement of interests, and defines the role of the degree of fault, behavior mode and damage result in the judgment. It innovatively puts forward the "scenario-based" application mode, and adjusts the intensity of protection according to different situations, which not only protects individual dignity from infringement, but also promotes the reasonable flow of information. At the same time, a multiple relief system has been established, covering preventive measures and post-remedial mechanism, to strengthen the comprehensive protection of victims. This study not only enriches the theoretical system of privacy rights and reputation rights.
Keyword:Civil Code Right To Privacy And Reputation Protection Balancing Mechanism
目 录
1绪论 1
1.1研究背景与意义 1
1.2国内外研究现状 1
1.3研究方法概述 1
2隐私权与名誉权的法理基础 2
2.1民法典中的隐私权界定 2
2.2民法典中的名誉权界定 3
2.3两种权利的法律属性比较 3
3权利冲突的表现形式 4
3.1新闻报道中的冲突案例 4
3.2网络环境下的特殊挑战 4
3.3社交媒体引发的新问题 5
4平衡机制的构建路径 5
4.1立法层面的完善建议 5
4.2司法实践中的平衡原则 6
4.3社会治理的协同作用 7
结论 7
参考文献 9
致谢 10
随着信息技术的迅猛发展，隐私权与名誉权保护面临前所未有的挑战，《民法典》作为民事基本法，在平衡二者关系方面具有重要意义。本研究旨在探讨《民法典》中隐私权与名誉权保护的平衡机制，以期为司法实践提供理论支持。通过文献分析、比较研究及案例剖析等方法，深入解读《民法典》相关条款内涵，梳理国内外立法例，剖析典型判例。研究发现，《民法典》确立了以权利位阶为基础、兼顾利益衡量的平衡原则，明确了行为人过错程度、行为方式、损害结果等因素在判定中的作用。创新性地提出“场景化”适用模式，根据不同情境调整保护强度，既保障个人尊严免受侵害，又促进信息合理流动。同时，构建了多元救济体系，涵盖预防性措施、事后补救机制，强化对受害人的全面保护。本研究不仅丰富了隐私权与名誉权理论体系。
关键词：民法典 隐私权与名誉权保护 平衡机制
Abstract
With the rapid development of information technology, the protection of privacy and reputation rights is facing unprecedented challenges. As the basic law of civil affairs, the Civil Code is of great significance in balancing the relationship between the two. The purpose of this study is to explore the balance mechanism between privacy and reputation protection in the Civil Code in order to provide theoretical support for judicial practice. Through literature analysis, comparative research and case analysis, the connotation of the relevant provisions of the Civil Code is deeply interpreted, domestic and foreign legislative cases are sorted out, and typical cases are analyzed. It is found that the Civil Code establishes the principle of balance based on the rank of rights and taking into account the measurement of interests, and defines the role of the degree of fault, behavior mode and damage result in the judgment. It innovatively puts forward the "scenario-based" application mode, and adjusts the intensity of protection according to different situations, which not only protects individual dignity from infringement, but also promotes the reasonable flow of information. At the same time, a multiple relief system has been established, covering preventive measures and post-remedial mechanism, to strengthen the comprehensive protection of victims. This study not only enriches the theoretical system of privacy rights and reputation rights.
Keyword:Civil Code Right To Privacy And Reputation Protection Balancing Mechanism
目 录
1绪论 1
1.1研究背景与意义 1
1.2国内外研究现状 1
1.3研究方法概述 1
2隐私权与名誉权的法理基础 2
2.1民法典中的隐私权界定 2
2.2民法典中的名誉权界定 3
2.3两种权利的法律属性比较 3
3权利冲突的表现形式 4
3.1新闻报道中的冲突案例 4
3.2网络环境下的特殊挑战 4
3.3社交媒体引发的新问题 5
4平衡机制的构建路径 5
4.1立法层面的完善建议 5
4.2司法实践中的平衡原则 6
4.3社会治理的协同作用 7
结论 7
参考文献 9
致谢 10
