摘 要
化工过程模拟与优化是现代化工行业中提升生产效率、降低能耗和减少环境影响的重要手段，而软件工具的性能直接影响模拟与优化的效果。本研究以当前主流化工过程模拟与优化软件为研究对象，系统比较了Aspen Plus、PRO/II、gPROMS以及COMSOL Multiphysics等软件的功能特性、计算精度、适用范围及用户友好性。研究旨在为化工企业及科研人员选择合适的软件提供科学依据，并探索不同软件在特定场景下的协同应用潜力。通过构建典型化工过程模型并进行多维度对比分析，结果表明 Aspen Plus 在复杂化学反应过程建模方面具有显著优势，而 gPROMS 则更适合动态过程优化；PRO/II 在稳态分离过程中的计算效率较高，COMSOL Multiphysics 则在多物理场耦合问题中表现出色。此外，本研究创新性地提出了一种基于多软件联合仿真的方法，解决了单一软件在某些复杂场景下功能局限的问题。研究表明，合理选择和组合使用软件可以显著提高模拟与优化的准确性和效率。这一研究成果不仅为化工过程设计与优化提供了新的思路，还为未来软件开发方向提出了建设性建议，对推动化工行业的数字化转型具有重要意义。关键词：化工过程模拟；软件性能比较；Aspen Plus；gPROMS；多软件联合仿真
Abstract
Chemical process simulation and optimization are crucial approaches in the modern chemical industry for enhancing production efficiency, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing environmental impacts, with the performance of software tools directly influencing the effectiveness of simulation and optimization. This study systematically evaluates mainstream chemical process simulation and optimization software, including Aspen Plus, PRO/II, gPROMS, and COMSOL Multiphysics, focusing on their functional characteristics, computational accuracy, applicability, and user-friendliness. The aim is to provide scientific guidance for chemical enterprises and researchers in selecting appropriate software and to explore the potential for collaborative application of different software in specific scenarios. By constructing typical chemical process models and conducting multidimensional comparative analyses, the results indicate that Aspen Plus demonstrates significant advantages in modeling complex chemical reaction processes, while gPROMS is more suitable for dynamic process optimization. PRO/II exhibits higher computational efficiency in steady-state separation processes, and COMSOL Multiphysics performs exceptionally well in multiphysics coupling problems. Furthermore, this study innovatively proposes a method based on multi-software co-simulation, addressing the functional limitations of single software in certain complex situations. The findings reveal that appropriately selecting and combining software can substantially improve the accuracy and efficiency of simulation and optimization. This research not only offers new perspectives for the design and optimization of chemical processes but also provides constructive suggestions for future software development, playing a significant role in promoting the digital transformation of the chemical industry..Key Words：Chemical Process Simulation；Software Performance Comparison；Aspen Plus；Gproms；Multi-software Co-simulation
目 录
摘 要 I
Abstract II
第1章 绪论 1
1.1 化工过程模拟与优化软件的研究背景 1
1.2 化工过程模拟与优化软件的研究意义 1
1.3 国内外研究现状分析 1
1.4 本文研究方法与技术路线 2
第2章 化工过程模拟与优化软件的功能比较 3
2.1 模拟功能的范围与深度分析 3
2.2 优化算法的性能对比 3
2.3 用户界面友好性评估 4
2.4 数据处理能力的差异分析 4
2.5 功能模块扩展性比较 5
第3章 化工过程模拟与优化软件的技术特性分析 6
3.1 数学建模方法的对比研究 6
3.2 计算效率与精度的权衡 6
3.3 软件稳定性与可靠性评价 7
3.4 并行计算支持能力分析 8
3.5 技术创新点的识别与比较 8
第4章 化工过程模拟与优化软件的应用场景与案例分析 10
4.1 不同化工领域的适用性分析 10
4.2 典型应用场景的案例研究 10
4.3 工业实践中的问题与挑战 11
4.4 用户反馈与改进建议分析 11
4.5 应用效果的综合评价 12
结 论 13
参考文献 14
致 谢 15
